ABEQ vs ESN
Absolute Select Value ETF vs Essential 40 Stock ETF
Which is better, ABEQ or ESN?
ESN has been ahead.
ESN has a lower expense ratio. ESN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABEQ | ESN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | $140M | $343M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.16% | 0.76% |
| Holdings | 46 | 84 |
| YTD Return | +7.49% | +19.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.74% | +21.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.61% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 10.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.0%Best | -13.6% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $11,936 | $13,750Best |
| Fund Family | Absolute Funds | KKM Financial |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 21, 2020 | Jun 11, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (2 years).
ABEQ vs ESN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
ABEQ vs ESN Performance
Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) is an ETF from Absolute Funds and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) is an ETF from KKM Financial. Over the past year ABEQ returned +9.74% while ESN returned +21.86%. Year to date, ABEQ is up 7.49% versus a gain of 19.88% for ESN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ABEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 10.6% for ESN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.0% for ABEQ and -13.6% for ESN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABEQ charges 0.85% per year while ESN charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $70 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABEQ currently yields 1.16% against 0.76% for ESN.
Holdings Overlap
At least 4.9% of ESN's money is in holdings ABEQ also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ABEQ, our book for it covers 83.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
ESN and ABEQ share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in ABEQ and 41 in ESN, against full books of 46 and 84.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ABEQ and ESN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABEQ or ESN?
ABEQ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while ESN charges 0.70%. ESN is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABEQ or ESN?
Over the past year ABEQ returned +9.74% vs +21.86% for ESN, so ESN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ABEQ annualized +9.25% vs +17.26% for ESN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABEQ or ESN?
ABEQ has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 10.6% for ESN. Worst drawdown: ABEQ -8.0% vs ESN -13.6%.
Should I hold both ABEQ and ESN?
ABEQ and ESN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABEQ and ESN?
At least 4.9% of ESN's money is in holdings ABEQ also owns. Our book for ABEQ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in ABEQ and 41 in ESN.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABEQ or ESN?
ABEQ yields 1.16% while ESN yields 0.76%, so ABEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ESN better than ABEQ?
ESN has a lower expense ratio. ESN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.