ABOT vs QQQ
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ABOT or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABOT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 52 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +15.72% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.02% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.35% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.45% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 19.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.7%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,437 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.9%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Donoghue Forlines ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.8 years).
ABOT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
ABOT vs QQQ Performance
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ABOT returned +12.02% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, ABOT is up 15.72% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, ABOT compounded at +21.35% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.45% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +16.52% annualized vs +11.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 17.1% for ABOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.7% for ABOT and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABOT charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABOT currently yields 0.27% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
38.8% of ABOT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 23.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings ABOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 52 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 79 positions ABOT does not, 73.2% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 5.76%, MU 5.02%, AMD 4.17%, AMZN 4.07%, META 3.26%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ABOT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.23% | 8.33% | 3.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.14% | 7.35% | 2.21% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.12% | 2.53% | 1.59% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.81% | 1.13% | 1.68% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.83% | 0.77% | 2.06% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 2.89% | 0.55% | 2.34% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.21% | 0.81% | 1.40% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.32% | 0.40% | 1.92% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.21% | 0.28% | 1.93% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 2.27% | 0.18% | 2.09% |
38.8% of ABOT is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABOT or QQQ?
ABOT has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ABOT or QQQ?
Over the past year ABOT returned +12.02% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ABOT annualized +11.80% vs +16.52% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ABOT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 17.1% for ABOT. Worst drawdown: ABOT -29.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both ABOT and QQQ?
ABOT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ABOT and QQQ?
38.8% of ABOT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 23.1% of QQQ's is in holdings ABOT also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ABOT and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABOT or QQQ?
ABOT yields 0.27% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ABOT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ABOT is less concentrated, with 33.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.