ACEI vs DJUN

ACEI vs DJUN

Which is better, ACEI or DJUN?

Each has led over a different period.

ACEI has a lower expense ratio. ACEI led over 1Y, DJUN over the full window.

Lower Fees: ACEIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACEIDJUN
Expense Ratio0.79%Best0.85%
AUM$52M$370M
Dividend Yield11.88%0.00%
Holdings2610
YTD Return+7.65%Best+6.22%
1Y Return+9.38%Best+8.37%
3Y Return (annualized)-+11.96%
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.21%
Volatility (annualized)10.2%3.7%Best
Max Drawdown-9.3%-3.1%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$10,755$10,903Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionSep 24, 2025Jun 19, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 25, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).

ACEI vs DJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.

Compare ACEI against instead:ACEI vs SPYACEI vs QQQACEI vs VOOACEI vs VTIDJUN against:DJUN vs VXUS

ACEI vs DJUN Performance

Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ACEI returned +9.38% while DJUN returned +8.37%. Year to date, ACEI is up 7.65% versus a gain of 6.22% for DJUN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ACEI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.2% compared with 3.7% for DJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for ACEI and -3.1% for DJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACEI charges 0.79% per year while DJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $85 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACEI currently yields 11.88% against 0.00% for DJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ACEI and DJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ACEIDJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACEI or DJUN?

ACEI has an expense ratio of 0.79% while DJUN charges 0.85%. ACEI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ACEI or DJUN?

Over the past year ACEI returned +9.38% vs +8.37% for DJUN, so ACEI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACEI annualized +6.84% vs +8.18% for DJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ACEI or DJUN?

ACEI has been the more volatile fund at 10.2% annualized versus 3.7% for DJUN. Worst drawdown: ACEI -9.3% vs DJUN -3.1%.

Should I hold both ACEI and DJUN?

ACEI and DJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACEI or DJUN?

ACEI yields 11.88% while DJUN yields 0.00%, so ACEI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DJUN better than ACEI?

ACEI has a lower expense ratio. ACEI led over 1Y, DJUN over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.