ACGR vs CARK
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs CastleArk Large Growth ETF
Which is better, ACGR or CARK?
Nearly the same fund. ACGR costs less.
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over the full window, CARK over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | CARK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.54% |
| AUM | $11M | $351M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 94 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +7.66% | +9.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.05% | +11.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.56% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6%Best | -25.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $16,165Best | $16,010 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4%Best | 63.4% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | CastleArk Management LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Dec 6, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
ACGR vs CARK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs CARK Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and CastleArk Large Growth ETF (CARK) is an ETF from CastleArk Management LLC. Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% while CARK returned +11.27%. Year to date, ACGR is up 7.66% versus a gain of 9.30% for CARK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for ACGR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for ACGR and -25.2% for CARK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while CARK charges 0.54%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $54 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.10% against 0.01% for CARK.
Holdings Overlap
59.1% of ACGR's money is in holdings CARK also owns. 77.8% of CARK's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
Most of CARK is already inside ACGR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 29 in CARK, against full books of 94 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for CARK that do not appear in our book for ACGR (20.9% of the fund), and 68 for ACGR that do not appear in CARK (37.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in CARK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.38% | 14.36% | 0.98% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.90% | 9.33% | 2.57% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 4.24% | 1.48% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.61% | 6.30% | 2.69% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 4.68% | 0.22% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 5.21% | 2.24% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.29% | 5.43% | 3.14% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.85% | 4.45% | 2.60% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.14% | 2.54% | 0.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.04% | 3.48% | 1.44% |
77.8% of CARK is already inside ACGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or CARK?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while CARK charges 0.54%. ACGR is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACGR or CARK?
Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% vs +11.27% for CARK, so CARK leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or CARK?
CARK has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for ACGR. Worst drawdown: ACGR -24.6% vs CARK -25.2%.
Should I hold both ACGR and CARK?
ACGR and CARK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and CARK?
77.8% of CARK's money is in holdings ACGR also owns. 77.8% of CARK's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 29 in CARK.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or CARK?
ACGR yields 0.10% while CARK yields 0.01%, so ACGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CARK better than ACGR?
ACGR has a lower expense ratio. ACGR led over the full window, CARK over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.