ACGR vs FLCG
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, ACGR or FLCG?
FLCG has been ahead.
FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACGR | FLCG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Tie | 0.39%Tie |
| AUM | $11M | $687M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 94 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +7.66%Best | +7.29% |
| 1Y Return | +9.05% | +9.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.56% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.15% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6% | -22.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,269 | $14,083Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.4%Best | 56.5% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Federated Hermes |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2021 | Jul 30, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
ACGR vs FLCG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
ACGR vs FLCG Performance
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) is an ETF from Federated Hermes. Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% while FLCG returned +9.89%. Year to date, ACGR is up 7.66% versus a gain of 7.29% for FLCG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.3% for FLCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for ACGR and -22.9% for FLCG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACGR charges 0.39% per year while FLCG charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $39 annually. On income, ACGR currently yields 0.10% against 0.04% for FLCG.
Holdings Overlap
72.2% of ACGR's money is in holdings FLCG also owns. 75.7% of FLCG's money is in holdings ACGR also owns.
Most of FLCG is already inside ACGR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
37 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 100 in FLCG, against full books of 94 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 58 positions for FLCG that do not appear in our book for ACGR (23.6% of the fund), and 50 for ACGR that do not appear in FLCG (24.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACGR | Weight in FLCG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.38% | 15.20% | 1.82% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.90% | 11.70% | 0.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.61% | 7.97% | 4.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.90% | 4.54% | 0.36% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.72% | 3.10% | 2.62% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.46% | 3.00% | 0.54% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.97% | 2.37% | 0.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.04% | 2.88% | 0.84% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.96% | 2.73% | 1.77% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.90% | 2.76% | 1.86% |
75.7% of FLCG is already inside ACGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACGR or FLCG?
ACGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while FLCG charges 0.39%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, ACGR or FLCG?
Over the past year ACGR returned +9.05% vs +9.89% for FLCG, so FLCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ACGR annualized +13.72% vs +16.84% for FLCG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACGR or FLCG?
ACGR has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.3% for FLCG. Worst drawdown: ACGR -24.6% vs FLCG -22.9%.
Should I hold both ACGR and FLCG?
ACGR and FLCG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACGR and FLCG?
75.7% of FLCG's money is in holdings ACGR also owns. 75.7% of FLCG's is in holdings ACGR also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in ACGR and 100 in FLCG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACGR or FLCG?
ACGR yields 0.10% while FLCG yields 0.04%, so ACGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCG better than ACGR?
FLCG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ACGR is less concentrated, with 52.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.