ACII vs LJAN
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, ACII or LJAN?
ACII has been ahead.
ACII led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACII | LJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $147M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 8.44% | 4.91% |
| Holdings | 18 | 19 |
| YTD Return | +7.34%Best | +0.71% |
| 1Y Return | +10.33%Best | +0.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.7% | 2.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -2.3%Best | -2.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,005Best | $9,989 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | Jan 2, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 25, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
ACII vs LJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
ACII vs LJAN Performance
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year ACII returned +10.33% while LJAN returned +0.12%. Year to date, ACII is up 7.34% versus a gain of 0.71% for LJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACII has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.7% compared with 2.2% for LJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.3% for ACII and -2.9% for LJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACII charges 0.79% per year while LJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, ACII currently yields 8.44% against 4.91% for LJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACII and LJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACII or LJAN?
ACII has an expense ratio of 0.79% while LJAN charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, ACII or LJAN?
Over the past year ACII returned +10.33% vs +0.12% for LJAN, so ACII leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACII annualized +9.10% vs -0.10% for LJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACII or LJAN?
ACII has been the more volatile fund at 3.7% annualized versus 2.2% for LJAN. Worst drawdown: ACII -2.3% vs LJAN -2.9%.
Should I hold both ACII and LJAN?
ACII and LJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACII or LJAN?
ACII yields 8.44% while LJAN yields 4.91%, so ACII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LJAN better than ACII?
ACII led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.