ACIO vs BGY
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust
Which is better, ACIO or BGY?
ACIO has been ahead.
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BGY is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | BGY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.99% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $569M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 8.03% |
| Holdings | 524 | 127 |
| YTD Return | +8.01%Best | +0.81% |
| 1Y Return | +8.79%Best | +5.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63%Best | +13.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74%Best | +5.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,916Best | $13,294 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 35.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | BlackRock, Inc. (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | May 25, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.3 years).
ACIO vs BGY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs BGY Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust (BGY) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US). Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% while BGY returned +5.95%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 0.81% for BGY.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +15.63% per year against +13.04% for BGY; over five years the annualized figures are +9.74% and +5.86% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, ACIO has the edge at +9.65% annualized vs +6.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 10.0% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for ACIO and -35.0% for BGY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while BGY charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $99 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 8.03% for BGY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 167 holdings in ACIO and 47 in BGY, totalling 99.7% and 98.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, ACIO as of Oct 1, 2026 and BGY as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 47 in BGY, against full books of 524 and 127.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for BGY that do not appear in our book for ACIO (0.3% of the fund), and 166 for ACIO that do not appear in BGY (99.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIO and BGY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or BGY?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while BGY charges 0.99%. ACIO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or BGY?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% vs +5.95% for BGY, so ACIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ACIO annualized +9.65% vs +6.25% for BGY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or BGY?
BGY has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 10.0% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -14.9% vs BGY -35.0%.
Should I hold both ACIO and BGY?
ACIO and BGY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or BGY?
ACIO yields 0.39% while BGY yields 8.03%, so BGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BGY better than ACIO?
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BGY is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.