ACIO vs FGSI
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Which is better, ACIO or FGSI?
ACIO has been ahead.
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y and the full window. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | FGSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 8.42% |
| Holdings | 524 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +8.29% | +8.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.92%Best | +5.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8%Tie | 8.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -7.2%Best | -8.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,543Best | $11,279 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 24.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Jun 25, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026 (1.3 years).
ACIO vs FGSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs FGSI Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% while FGSI returned +5.98%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.29% versus a gain of 8.87% for FGSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACIO and FGSI have been equally volatile, both at 8.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.2% for ACIO and -8.6% for FGSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while FGSI charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $85 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 8.42% for FGSI.
Holdings Overlap
27.3% of ACIO's money is in holdings FGSI also owns. 61.1% of FGSI's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 50 in FGSI, against full books of 524 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for FGSI that do not appear in our book for ACIO (38.3% of the fund), and 136 for ACIO that do not appear in FGSI (72.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in FGSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 2.25% | 6.19% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 2.57% | 3.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 2.22% | 0.20% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.46% | 1.87% | 0.59% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 2.78% | 2.13% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 1.91% | 0.51% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.39% | 2.82% | 2.43% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.33% | 2.51% | 2.18% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.52% | 2.25% | 1.73% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 0.37% | 2.40% | 2.03% |
61.1% of FGSI is already inside ACIO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or FGSI?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while FGSI charges 0.85%. ACIO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or FGSI?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% vs +5.98% for FGSI, so ACIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACIO annualized +11.67% vs +9.70% for FGSI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or FGSI?
ACIO and FGSI have been equally volatile, both at 8.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: ACIO -7.2% vs FGSI -8.6%.
Should I hold both ACIO and FGSI?
ACIO and FGSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and FGSI?
61.1% of FGSI's money is in holdings ACIO also owns. 61.1% of FGSI's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 50 in FGSI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or FGSI?
ACIO yields 0.39% while FGSI yields 8.42%, so FGSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FGSI better than ACIO?
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 1Y and the full window. FGSI is less concentrated, with 24.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.