ACIO vs GUSE

ACIO vs GUSE

Which is better, ACIO or GUSE?

GUSE has been ahead.

GUSE has a lower expense ratio. GUSE led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.

Lower Fees: GUSEHigher Returns (1Y): GUSELess Concentrated: GUSE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACIOGUSE
Expense Ratio0.79%0.30%Best
AUM$2.4B$365M
Dividend Yield0.39%0.64%
Holdings524121
YTD Return+8.01%+13.52%Best
1Y Return+8.79%+17.06%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.74%-
Top 10 Weight40.8%40.0%Best
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsGoldman Sachs Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 9, 2019Jan 31, 2008

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACIO vs GUSE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACIO against instead:ACIO vs SPYACIO vs QQQACIO vs VOOACIO vs VTIGUSE against:GUSE vs VXUS

ACIO vs GUSE Performance

Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Goldman Sachs Enhanced US Equity ETF (GUSE) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% while GUSE returned +17.06%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 13.52% for GUSE.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACIO charges 0.79% per year while GUSE charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $30 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 0.64% for GUSE.

Holdings Overlap

ACIO already in GUSE65.9%
GUSE already in ACIO69.8%

65.9% of ACIO's money is in holdings GUSE also owns. 69.8% of GUSE's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

55 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 122 in GUSE, against full books of 524 and 121.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 63 positions for GUSE that do not appear in our book for ACIO (27.7% of the fund), and 111 for ACIO that do not appear in GUSE (33.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACIOWeight in GUSEDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%8.85%0.41%
AAPLApple, Inc7.26%7.62%0.36%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.75%5.03%0.72%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.69%4.18%0.49%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.39%2.21%3.18%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.42%2.49%0.07%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.46%2.39%0.07%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.92%2.01%0.09%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.61%1.72%0.11%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.68%1.62%0.06%

69.8% of GUSE is already inside ACIO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACIOGUSE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACIO or GUSE?

ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GUSE charges 0.30%. GUSE is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ACIO or GUSE?

Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% vs +17.06% for GUSE, so GUSE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and GUSE?

69.8% of GUSE's money is in holdings ACIO also owns. 69.8% of GUSE's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 122 in GUSE.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or GUSE?

ACIO yields 0.39% while GUSE yields 0.64%, so GUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GUSE better than ACIO?

GUSE has a lower expense ratio. GUSE led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 40.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.