ACIO vs KALL
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
Which is better, ACIO or KALL?
Each has led over a different period.
KALL has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over the full window, KALL over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | KALL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 2.19% |
| Holdings | 524 | 210 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3%Best | 24.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -56.3% |
| $10,000 over 5.9 years | $16,672Best | $10,950 |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Feb 12, 2015 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 512 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ACIO has data through Oct 14, 2026 and KALL through May 20, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2019 to May 20, 2025 (5.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KALL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 10.3% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for ACIO and -56.3% for KALL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while KALL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $49 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 2.19% for KALL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIO and KALL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or KALL?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while KALL charges 0.49%. KALL is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ACIO or KALL?
KALL has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 10.3% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -14.9% vs KALL -56.3%.
Should I hold both ACIO and KALL?
ACIO and KALL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or KALL?
ACIO yields 0.39% while KALL yields 2.19%, so KALL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KALL better than ACIO?
KALL has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over the full window, KALL over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.