ACIO vs LGHT
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Langar Global Healthtech ETF
Which is better, ACIO or LGHT?
Each has led over a different period.
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over the full window, LGHT over 1Y. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | LGHT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 524 | 32 |
| YTD Return | +8.29% | +12.20%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.92% | +11.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1%Best | 17.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1%Best | -28.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $14,422Best | $11,023 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 75.5% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Langar Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Jan 10, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 10, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.8 years).
ACIO vs LGHT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs LGHT Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Langar Global Healthtech ETF (LGHT) is an ETF from Langar Investment Management. Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% while LGHT returned +11.48%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.29% versus a gain of 12.20% for LGHT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGHT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 9.1% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for ACIO and -28.6% for LGHT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while LGHT charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $85 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 0.00% for LGHT.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of ACIO's money is in holdings LGHT also owns. 8.1% of LGHT's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.
LGHT and ACIO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 31 in LGHT, against full books of 524 and 32.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 26 positions for LGHT that do not appear in our book for ACIO (81.0% of the fund), and 165 for ACIO that do not appear in LGHT (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in LGHT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 0.32% | 8.10% | 7.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIO and LGHT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or LGHT?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while LGHT charges 0.85%. ACIO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or LGHT?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% vs +11.48% for LGHT, so LGHT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or LGHT?
LGHT has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 9.1% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -12.1% vs LGHT -28.6%.
Should I hold both ACIO and LGHT?
ACIO and LGHT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and LGHT?
8.1% of LGHT's money is in holdings ACIO also owns. 8.1% of LGHT's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 31 in LGHT.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or LGHT?
ACIO yields 0.39% while LGHT yields 0.00%, so ACIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LGHT better than ACIO?
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over the full window, LGHT over 1Y. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.