ACIO vs WAGN
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Pabrai Wagons ETF
Which is better, ACIO or WAGN?
WAGN has been ahead.
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. WAGN led over 1Y. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | WAGN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.90% |
| AUM | $2.4B | $302M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 524 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +8.01%Best | +7.75% |
| 1Y Return | +8.79% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 68.1% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Pabrai Wagons Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Feb 9, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ACIO vs WAGN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIO vs WAGN Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) is an ETF from Pabrai Wagons Fund. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 7.75% for WAGN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while WAGN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $90 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 0.00% for WAGN.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of ACIO's money is in holdings WAGN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 21 in WAGN, against full books of 524 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for WAGN that do not appear in our book for ACIO (25.4% of the fund), and 165 for ACIO that do not appear in WAGN (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in WAGN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FXFXXFirst Am Treas Obli-X | 0.20% | 0.04% | 0.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIO and WAGN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or WAGN?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while WAGN charges 0.90%. ACIO is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or WAGN?
ACIO yields 0.39% while WAGN yields 0.00%, so ACIO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WAGN better than ACIO?
ACIO has a lower expense ratio. WAGN led over 1Y. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.