ACIO vs WLTG
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Which is better, ACIO or WLTG?
WLTG has been ahead.
WLTG has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.74%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $77M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 4.08% |
| Holdings | 524 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +8.29% | +8.63%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.92% | +13.38%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.71% | +22.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 13.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0%Best | -25.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.9 years | $15,268 | $15,896Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | WealthTrust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Dec 6, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 7, 2021 to Oct 15, 2026 (4.9 years).
ACIO vs WLTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs WLTG Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) is an ETF from WealthTrust Asset Management. Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% while WLTG returned +13.38%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.29% versus a gain of 8.63% for WLTG.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +15.71% per year against +22.71% for WLTG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WLTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 10.4% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for ACIO and -25.1% for WLTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while WLTG charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $74 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 4.08% for WLTG.
Holdings Overlap
35.2% of ACIO's money is in holdings WLTG also owns. 35.5% of WLTG's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 41 in WLTG, against full books of 524 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for WLTG that do not appear in our book for ACIO (58.8% of the fund), and 151 for ACIO that do not appear in WLTG (64.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in WLTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 4.25% | 4.19% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.26% | 1.67% | 5.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 2.05% | 3.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.69% | 2.93% | 0.76% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.87% | 1.45% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 3.53% | 2.13% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.92% | 2.78% | 0.86% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.46% | 1.91% | 0.55% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.54% | 2.64% | 2.10% |
| HCAHca Healthcare Inc. | 0.11% | 2.22% | 2.11% |
35.5% of WLTG is already inside ACIO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or WLTG?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while WLTG charges 0.74%. WLTG is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or WLTG?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.92% vs +13.38% for WLTG, so WLTG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or WLTG?
WLTG has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 10.4% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -14.0% vs WLTG -25.1%.
Should I hold both ACIO and WLTG?
ACIO and WLTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and WLTG?
35.5% of WLTG's money is in holdings ACIO also owns. 35.5% of WLTG's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 41 in WLTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or WLTG?
ACIO yields 0.39% while WLTG yields 4.08%, so WLTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WLTG better than ACIO?
WLTG has a lower expense ratio. WLTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.