ACIO vs XLSR
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs State Street US Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, ACIO or XLSR?
Each has led over a different period.
XLSR has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 5Y, XLSR over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 524 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +8.01%Best | +7.62% |
| 1Y Return | +8.79% | +12.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.63% | +17.39%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74%Best | +9.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 16.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -32.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,916Best | $15,901 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 85.3% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Apr 2, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.3 years).
ACIO vs XLSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs XLSR Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% while XLSR returned +12.95%. Year to date, ACIO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 7.62% for XLSR.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +15.63% per year against +17.39% for XLSR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.74% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, XLSR has the edge at +12.31% annualized vs +9.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 10.0% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for ACIO and -32.9% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $70 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.39% against 0.45% for XLSR.
Holdings Overlap
43.5% of ACIO's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 23.2% of XLSR's money is in holdings ACIO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 25 in XLSR, against full books of 524 and 26.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 167 and 25 positions we hold weights for.
ACIO holds 150 positions XLSR does not, 56.1% of the fund.
Largest: V 1.82%, JPM 1.68%, BRK.B 1.42%, LLY 1.40%, BLK 1.09%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in XLSR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 4.47% | 3.97% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.26% | 4.12% | 3.14% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.39% | 4.02% | 1.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 2.98% | 2.77% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.42% | 3.03% | 0.61% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.69% | 0.95% | 2.74% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.46% | 1.41% | 1.05% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.92% | 0.62% | 1.30% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.47% | 0.41% | 1.06% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.61% | 0.15% | 1.46% |
43.5% of ACIO is already inside XLSR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or XLSR?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XLSR charges 0.70%. XLSR is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or XLSR?
Over the past year ACIO returned +8.79% vs +12.95% for XLSR, so XLSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ACIO annualized +9.65% vs +12.31% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or XLSR?
XLSR has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 10.0% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -14.9% vs XLSR -32.9%.
Should I hold both ACIO and XLSR?
ACIO and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and XLSR?
43.5% of ACIO's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 23.2% of XLSR's is in holdings ACIO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 25 in XLSR.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or XLSR?
ACIO yields 0.39% while XLSR yields 0.45%, so XLSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLSR better than ACIO?
XLSR has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 5Y, XLSR over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ACIO is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 85.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.