ACVF vs NUDG

ACVF vs NUDG

Which is better, ACVF or NUDG?

ACVF has been ahead.

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%.

Lower Fees: NUDGHigher Returns (1Y): ACVFLess Concentrated: ACVF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVFNUDG
Expense Ratio0.75%0.61%Best
AUM$155M$6.2B
Dividend Yield0.49%0.50%
Holdings77843
YTD Return+11.40%Best+2.67%
1Y Return+12.34%-
3Y Return (annualized)+18.66%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.53%-
Top 10 Weight28.8%Best42.3%
Fund FamilyACV ETFsNuveen
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 28, 2020Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ACVF vs NUDG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ACVF against instead:ACVF vs SPYACVF vs QQQACVF vs VOOACVF vs VTINUDG against:NUDG vs VXUS

ACVF vs NUDG Performance

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, ACVF is up 11.40% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVF charges 0.75% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $61 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.49% against 0.50% for NUDG.

Holdings Overlap

ACVF already in NUDG24.9%
NUDG already in ACVF69.8%

24.9% of ACVF's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 69.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

32 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 778 and 43.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 9 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for ACVF (24.7% of the fund), and 341 for ACVF that do not appear in NUDG (74.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVFWeight in NUDGDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.34%7.67%2.33%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.52%5.11%2.59%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A0.39%3.83%3.44%
MAMastercard Inc1.53%2.54%1.01%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd1.65%2.01%0.36%
WMTWalmart, Inc.1.64%1.79%0.15%
NEENextera Energy Inc0.48%2.43%1.95%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.0.98%1.89%0.91%
MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc0.66%2.21%1.55%
ETNEaton Corp Plc0.58%2.26%1.68%

69.8% of NUDG is already inside ACVF.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ACVFNUDG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVF or NUDG?

ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while NUDG charges 0.61%. NUDG is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and NUDG?

69.8% of NUDG's money is in holdings ACVF also owns. 69.8% of NUDG's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 42 in NUDG.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or NUDG?

ACVF yields 0.49% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NUDG better than ACVF?

NUDG has a lower expense ratio. ACVF led over 1Y. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.