ACVF vs SCHX
American Conservative Values ETF vs Schwab US Large-Cap ETF
Which is better, ACVF or SCHX?
Nearly the same fund. SCHX costs less.
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACVF | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $155M | $75.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 778 | 752 |
| YTD Return | +11.40% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.34% | +16.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.66% | +22.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.53% | +12.56%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,257 | $18,068Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 36.9% |
| Fund Family | ACV ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2020 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6 years).
ACVF vs SCHX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
ACVF vs SCHX Performance
American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is an ETF from ACV ETFs and Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ACVF returned +12.34% while SCHX returned +16.62%. Year to date, ACVF is up 11.40% versus a gain of 13.08% for SCHX.
Over three years, ACVF compounded at +18.66% per year against +22.27% for SCHX; over five years the annualized figures are +11.53% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +16.33% annualized vs +15.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.7% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -25.4% for SCHX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACVF charges 0.75% per year while SCHX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.49% against 1.04% for SCHX.
Holdings Overlap
97.6% of ACVF's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 61.6% of SCHX's money is in holdings ACVF also owns.
Most of ACVF is already inside SCHX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
347 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 752 in SCHX, against full books of 778 and 752.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 384 positions for SCHX that do not appear in our book for ACVF (37.8% of the fund), and 28 for ACVF that do not appear in SCHX (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACVF | Weight in SCHX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.46% | 8.02% | 0.44% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.34% | 5.44% | 0.10% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.52% | 2.40% | 0.12% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.69% | 1.72% | 0.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.72% | 0.63% | 2.09% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.66% | 1.33% | 0.33% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.63% | 1.30% | 0.33% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.41% | 1.47% | 0.06% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.19% | 1.48% | 0.29% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.65% | 0.96% | 0.69% |
97.6% of ACVF is already inside SCHX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACVF or SCHX?
ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHX charges 0.03%. SCHX is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACVF or SCHX?
Over the past year ACVF returned +12.34% vs +16.62% for SCHX, so SCHX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +15.29% vs +16.33% for SCHX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACVF or SCHX?
SCHX has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.7% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs SCHX -25.4%.
Should I hold both ACVF and SCHX?
ACVF and SCHX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and SCHX?
97.6% of ACVF's money is in holdings SCHX also owns. 61.6% of SCHX's is in holdings ACVF also owns. They hold 347 positions in common, counted across the 387 positions we hold weights for in ACVF and 752 in SCHX.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or SCHX?
ACVF yields 0.49% while SCHX yields 1.04%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHX better than ACVF?
SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SCHX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. ACVF is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.