ACWI vs BLLD
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF vs JPMorgan Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
Which is better, ACWI or BLLD?
ACWI has been ahead.
ACWI has a lower expense ratio. ACWI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACWI | BLLD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $33.2B | $21M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.64% |
| Holdings | 2,280 | 61 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.7%Best | -21.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,004Best | $10,569 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2008 | Sep 7, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 572 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ACWI has data through Oct 14, 2026 and BLLD through Mar 21, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2022 to Mar 21, 2025 (2.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 13.5% for ACWI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.7% for ACWI and -21.0% for BLLD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACWI charges 0.32% per year while BLLD charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $49 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACWI currently yields 1.41% against 1.64% for BLLD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACWI and BLLD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACWI or BLLD?
ACWI has an expense ratio of 0.32% while BLLD charges 0.49%. ACWI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ACWI or BLLD?
BLLD has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 13.5% for ACWI. Worst drawdown: ACWI -12.7% vs BLLD -21.0%.
Should I hold both ACWI and BLLD?
ACWI and BLLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACWI or BLLD?
ACWI yields 1.41% while BLLD yields 1.64%, so BLLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BLLD better than ACWI?
ACWI has a lower expense ratio. ACWI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.