ACWI vs IDX
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF vs VanEck Indonesia Index ETF
Which is better, ACWI or IDX?
ACWI has been ahead.
ACWI has a lower expense ratio. ACWI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ACWI is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACWI | IDX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $33.2B | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 3.23% |
| Holdings | 2,280 | 138 |
| YTD Return | +12.14%Best | -38.14% |
| 1Y Return | +17.07%Best | -34.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.96%Best | -13.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.83%Best | -11.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 25.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.5%Best | -63.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,722Best | $5,515 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.3%Best | 50.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2008 | Jan 15, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 20, 2009 to Oct 14, 2026 (17.7 years).
ACWI vs IDX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.7 years both funds cover.
ACWI vs IDX Performance
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year ACWI returned +17.07% while IDX returned -34.20%. Year to date, ACWI is up 12.14% versus a loss of 38.14% for IDX.
Over three years, ACWI compounded at +20.96% per year against -13.75% for IDX; over five years the annualized figures are +10.83% and -11.22% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, ACWI has the edge at +10.83% annualized vs +3.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 15.3% for ACWI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.5% for ACWI and -63.2% for IDX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACWI charges 0.32% per year while IDX charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $57 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACWI currently yields 1.41% against 3.23% for IDX.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of ACWI's money is in holdings IDX also owns. 42.5% of IDX's money is in holdings ACWI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 2,139 positions we hold weights for in ACWI and 64 in IDX, against full books of 2,280 and 138.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for IDX that do not appear in our book for ACWI (0.0% of the fund), and 514 for ACWI that do not appear in IDX (65.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACWI | Weight in IDX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBCA:IDBank Central Asia Tbk Pt | 0.02% | 8.17% | 8.15% |
| BBRI:IDBank Rakyat Indonesia Persero Tbk Pt | 0.01% | 8.06% | 8.05% |
| BMRI:IDBank Mandiri Persero Tbk Pt | 0.01% | 7.01% | 7.00% |
| TLKM:IDPt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Persero Tbk | 0.01% | 5.49% | 5.48% |
| ASII:IDAstra International Tbk Pt Ord Idr50 | 0.01% | 4.70% | 4.69% |
| BBNI:IDBank Negara Indonesia Persero Tbk Pt | 0.00% | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| BRMS:IDBumi Resources Minerals Tbk | 0.00% | 2.53% | 2.53% |
| UNTR:IDUnited Tractors Tbk Pt | 0.00% | 2.10% | 2.10% |
| BRPT:IDBarito Pacific Tbk Pt | 0.00% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
42.5% of IDX is already inside ACWI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACWI or IDX?
ACWI has an expense ratio of 0.32% while IDX charges 0.57%. ACWI is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACWI or IDX?
Over the past year ACWI returned +17.07% vs -34.20% for IDX, so ACWI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), ACWI annualized +10.83% vs +3.40% for IDX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACWI or IDX?
IDX has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 15.3% for ACWI. Worst drawdown: ACWI -33.5% vs IDX -63.2%.
Should I hold both ACWI and IDX?
ACWI and IDX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACWI and IDX?
42.5% of IDX's money is in holdings ACWI also owns. 42.5% of IDX's is in holdings ACWI also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 2,139 positions we hold weights for in ACWI and 64 in IDX.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACWI or IDX?
ACWI yields 1.41% while IDX yields 3.23%, so IDX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IDX better than ACWI?
ACWI has a lower expense ratio. ACWI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ACWI is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.