ADME vs AIEQ
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
Which is better, ADME or AIEQ?
Each has led over a different period.
AIEQ has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 5Y, AIEQ over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | AIEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $116M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.40% |
| Holdings | 167 | 326 |
| YTD Return | +9.94%Best | +9.72% |
| 1Y Return | +10.86% | +10.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38%Best | +3.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 20.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.7%Best | -39.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276Best | $12,085 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 41.1% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Oct 17, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 18, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9 years).
ADME vs AIEQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
ADME vs AIEQ Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while AIEQ returned +10.97%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 9.72% for AIEQ.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +18.64% for AIEQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +3.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, AIEQ has the edge at +9.53% annualized vs +7.81%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.0% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ADME and -39.0% for AIEQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while AIEQ charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.40% for AIEQ.
Holdings Overlap
62.5% of ADME's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 53.6% of AIEQ's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
65 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 163 in AIEQ, against full books of 167 and 326.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for AIEQ that do not appear in our book for ADME (45.8% of the fund), and 97 for ADME that do not appear in AIEQ (36.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in AIEQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.85% | 3.99% | 3.86% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 9.13% | 6.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 1.24% | 6.20% |
| GOOGAlphabate, Inc Class C | 5.56% | 2.76% | 2.80% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 2.18% | 3.52% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B | 1.48% | 3.66% | 2.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 1.27% | 2.47% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc., Long Equities | 0.68% | 4.25% | 3.57% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.36% | 3.80% | 3.44% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 0.25% | 3.61% | 3.36% |
62.5% of ADME is already inside AIEQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or AIEQ?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while AIEQ charges 0.75%. AIEQ is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or AIEQ?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +10.97% for AIEQ, so AIEQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), ADME annualized +7.81% vs +9.53% for AIEQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or AIEQ?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.0% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -28.7% vs AIEQ -39.0%.
Should I hold both ADME and AIEQ?
ADME and AIEQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and AIEQ?
62.5% of ADME's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 53.6% of AIEQ's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 65 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 163 in AIEQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or AIEQ?
ADME yields 0.36% while AIEQ yields 0.40%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is AIEQ better than ADME?
AIEQ has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 5Y, AIEQ over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.