ADME vs ARKW
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs ARK Next Generation Technology ETF
Which is better, ADME or ARKW?
Each has led over a different period.
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKW over 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | ARKW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.76%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $2.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.47% |
| Holdings | 167 | 88 |
| YTD Return | +9.94%Best | +7.08% |
| 1Y Return | +10.86%Best | -5.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +44.31%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38%Best | +2.38% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 35.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.7%Best | -80.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276Best | $11,248 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 44.6% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Ark Invest |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Sep 30, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.3 years).
ADME vs ARKW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.3 years both funds cover.
ADME vs ARKW Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and ARK Next Generation Technology ETF (ARKW) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while ARKW returned -5.81%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 7.08% for ARKW.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +44.31% for ARKW; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +2.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ARKW has the edge at +23.52% annualized vs +8.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.4% compared with 13.4% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ADME and -80.0% for ARKW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while ARKW charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $76 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 1.47% for ARKW.
Holdings Overlap
27.0% of ADME's money is in holdings ARKW also owns. 46.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 40 in ARKW, against full books of 167 and 88.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for ARKW that do not appear in our book for ADME (43.6% of the fund), and 150 for ADME that do not appear in ARKW (71.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in ARKW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 4.34% | 3.51% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.56% | 3.31% | 2.25% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 7.27% | 5.72% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 3.62% | 0.12% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 4.26% | 2.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 2.59% | 0.12% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.24% | 4.47% | 4.23% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 0.01% | 4.50% | 4.49% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.32% | 3.11% | 1.79% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.60% | 2.73% | 2.13% |
46.0% of ARKW is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or ARKW?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ARKW charges 0.76%. ARKW is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or ARKW?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs -5.81% for ARKW, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ADME annualized +8.38% vs +23.52% for ARKW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or ARKW?
ARKW has been the more volatile fund at 35.4% annualized versus 13.4% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -28.7% vs ARKW -80.0%.
Should I hold both ADME and ARKW?
ADME and ARKW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and ARKW?
46.0% of ARKW's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 46.0% of ARKW's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 40 in ARKW.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or ARKW?
ADME yields 0.36% while ARKW yields 1.47%, so ARKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ARKW better than ADME?
ARKW has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y and 5Y, ARKW over 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.