ADME vs BCTK

ADME vs BCTK

Which is better, ADME or BCTK?

BCTK has been ahead.

BCTK has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.

Lower Fees: BCTKHigher Returns (1Y): BCTKLess Concentrated: ADME

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEBCTK
Expense Ratio0.79%0.75%Best
AUM$313M-
Dividend Yield0.36%0.16%
Holdings16740
YTD Return+9.94%+17.64%Best
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.38%-
Top 10 Weight40.3%Best57.9%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsBaron Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2016Dec 12, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ADME vs BCTK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ADME against instead:ADME vs SPYADME vs QQQADME vs VOOADME vs VTIBCTK against:BCTK vs VXUS

ADME vs BCTK Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 17.64% for BCTK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while BCTK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.16% for BCTK.

Holdings Overlap

ADME already in BCTK29.4%
BCTK already in ADME59.2%

29.4% of ADME's money is in holdings BCTK also owns. 59.2% of BCTK's money is in holdings ADME also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 39 in BCTK, against full books of 167 and 40.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 14 positions for BCTK that do not appear in our book for ADME (24.2% of the fund), and 145 for ADME that do not appear in BCTK (69.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in BCTKDifference
NVDANvidia Corp7.85%7.12%0.73%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.56%6.29%0.73%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.74%4.58%0.84%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%5.02%2.55%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity0.64%6.61%5.97%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies0.01%6.67%6.66%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.64%4.78%3.14%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.32%3.73%2.41%
TSLATesla Inc1.55%3.30%1.75%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.26%1.13%1.13%

59.2% of BCTK is already inside ADME.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ADMEBCTK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or BCTK?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while BCTK charges 0.75%. BCTK is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and BCTK?

59.2% of BCTK's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 59.2% of BCTK's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 39 in BCTK.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or BCTK?

ADME yields 0.36% while BCTK yields 0.16%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BCTK better than ADME?

BCTK has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.