ADME vs CGGR
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Which is better, ADME or CGGR?
Each has led over a different period.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, CGGR over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $26.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 167 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +9.94%Best | +6.35% |
| 1Y Return | +10.86%Best | +8.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +24.14%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 19.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0%Best | -28.9% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $14,535 | $19,434Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 40.8% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.6 years).
ADME vs CGGR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
ADME vs CGGR Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while CGGR returned +8.20%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 6.35% for CGGR.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +24.14% for CGGR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 12.7% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for ADME and -28.9% for CGGR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while CGGR charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $39 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.15% for CGGR.
Holdings Overlap
52.8% of ADME's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 63.8% of CGGR's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
42 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 96 in CGGR, against full books of 167 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 41 positions for CGGR that do not appear in our book for ADME (27.3% of the fund), and 121 for ADME that do not appear in CGGR (46.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in CGGR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 5.07% | 2.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 4.66% | 1.04% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 2.53% | 4.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 6.58% | 4.32% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.56% | 3.24% | 2.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 4.43% | 1.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 2.38% | 1.36% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 4.17% | 2.62% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.64% | 3.88% | 2.24% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.88% | 3.13% | 1.25% |
63.8% of CGGR is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or CGGR?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while CGGR charges 0.39%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or CGGR?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +8.20% for CGGR, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or CGGR?
CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 12.7% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -20.0% vs CGGR -28.9%.
Should I hold both ADME and CGGR?
ADME and CGGR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and CGGR?
63.8% of CGGR's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 63.8% of CGGR's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 96 in CGGR.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or CGGR?
ADME yields 0.36% while CGGR yields 0.15%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGGR better than ADME?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, CGGR over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.