ADME vs DEPW

ADME vs DEPW

Which is better, ADME or DEPW?

DEPW costs less.

DEPW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.0%.

Lower Fees: DEPWLess Concentrated: ADME

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEDEPW
Expense Ratio0.79%0.59%Best
AUM$313M$2M
Dividend Yield0.36%0.00%
Holdings16725
YTD Return+9.94%Best-7.34%
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.38%-
Top 10 Weight40.3%Best60.0%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2016Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ADME vs DEPW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ADME against instead:ADME vs SPYADME vs QQQADME vs VOOADME vs VTIDEPW against:DEPW vs VXUS

ADME vs DEPW Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Google DeepMind AI Lab Ecosystem ETF (DEPW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a loss of 7.34% for DEPW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while DEPW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.00% for DEPW.

Holdings Overlap

ADME already in DEPW4.1%
DEPW already in ADME19.9%

4.1% of ADME's money is in holdings DEPW also owns. 19.9% of DEPW's money is in holdings ADME also owns.

DEPW and ADME share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 25 in DEPW, against full books of 167 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 13 positions for DEPW that do not appear in our book for ADME (61.5% of the fund), and 157 for ADME that do not appear in DEPW (94.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in DEPWDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%5.13%2.66%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc0.32%4.83%4.51%
SOSouthern Co.0.81%2.81%2.00%
NEENextera Energy Inc0.37%2.29%1.92%
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies0.01%2.61%2.60%
COHRCoherent, Inc0.10%2.25%2.15%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ADME and DEPW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ADMEDEPW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or DEPW?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while DEPW charges 0.59%. DEPW is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and DEPW?

19.9% of DEPW's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 19.9% of DEPW's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 25 in DEPW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or DEPW?

ADME yields 0.36% while DEPW yields 0.00%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DEPW better than ADME?

DEPW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.