ADME vs GK
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
Which is better, ADME or GK?
Each has led over a different period.
GK has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, GK over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | GK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.77%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 167 | 60 |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +10.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.86%Best | +8.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +19.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38%Best | +2.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 23.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.4%Best | -47.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276Best | $11,347 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 62.7% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Jul 1, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.3 years).
ADME vs GK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
ADME vs GK Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while GK returned +8.34%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 10.81% for GK.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +19.66% for GK; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and +2.56% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 12.8% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.4% for ADME and -47.7% for GK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while GK charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $77 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.07% for GK.
Holdings Overlap
40.3% of ADME's money is in holdings GK also owns. 76.4% of GK's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
Most of GK is already inside ADME. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
16 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 27 in GK, against full books of 167 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for GK that do not appear in our book for ADME (22.2% of the fund), and 147 for ADME that do not appear in GK (58.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in GK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 8.14% | 0.29% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.56% | 8.15% | 2.59% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 5.48% | 1.96% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.64% | 10.42% | 8.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 5.24% | 0.46% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 7.28% | 5.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 3.65% | 0.09% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 4.35% | 1.88% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.36% | 4.26% | 3.90% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.68% | 3.87% | 3.19% |
76.4% of GK is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or GK?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GK charges 0.77%. GK is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or GK?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +8.34% for GK, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or GK?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 12.8% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -23.4% vs GK -47.7%.
Should I hold both ADME and GK?
ADME and GK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and GK?
76.4% of GK's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 76.4% of GK's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 27 in GK.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or GK?
ADME yields 0.36% while GK yields 0.07%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GK better than ADME?
GK has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, GK over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.