ADME vs GRNY
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, ADME or GRNY?
Each has led over a different period.
GRNY has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, GRNY over the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $4.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 167 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +10.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.86%Best | +10.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -24.2% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $11,870 | $13,651Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 27.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Fundstrat Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Nov 7, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
ADME vs GRNY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
ADME vs GRNY Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while GRNY returned +10.25%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 10.83% for GRNY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 11.2% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ADME and -24.2% for GRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while GRNY charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $75 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.13% for GRNY.
Holdings Overlap
41.9% of ADME's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 78.7% of GRNY's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
Most of GRNY is already inside ADME. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 42 in GRNY, against full books of 167 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for GRNY that do not appear in our book for ADME (20.7% of the fund), and 130 for ADME that do not appear in GRNY (56.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in GRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 2.47% | 5.38% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 2.43% | 5.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 2.50% | 3.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 2.18% | 1.56% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.32% | 3.06% | 1.74% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.64% | 2.62% | 0.98% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.79% | 2.20% | 0.41% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 2.37% | 0.82% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.69% | 3.05% | 2.36% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.40% | 2.20% | 0.80% |
78.7% of GRNY is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or GRNY?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GRNY charges 0.75%. GRNY is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or GRNY?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +10.25% for GRNY, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ADME annualized +9.44% vs +17.80% for GRNY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or GRNY?
GRNY has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 11.2% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -15.7% vs GRNY -24.2%.
Should I hold both ADME and GRNY?
ADME and GRNY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and GRNY?
78.7% of GRNY's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 78.7% of GRNY's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 42 in GRNY.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or GRNY?
ADME yields 0.36% while GRNY yields 0.13%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GRNY better than ADME?
GRNY has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, GRNY over the full window. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.