ADME vs KOOL
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
Which is better, ADME or KOOL?
KOOL has been ahead.
ADME has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | KOOL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 0.93% |
| AUM | $313M | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 167 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +15.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.86% | +16.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -20.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,586 | $14,826Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 42.8% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | North Shore Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Apr 1, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
ADME vs KOOL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
ADME vs KOOL Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is an ETF from North Shore Indices. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while KOOL returned +16.89%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 15.54% for KOOL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 10.6% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ADME and -20.6% for KOOL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while KOOL charges 0.93%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $93 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.43% for KOOL.
Holdings Overlap
33.6% of ADME's money is in holdings KOOL also owns. 43.6% of KOOL's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 44 in KOOL, against full books of 167 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for KOOL that do not appear in our book for ADME (49.4% of the fund), and 146 for ADME that do not appear in KOOL (65.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in KOOL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 5.78% | 2.07% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 4.31% | 3.13% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 3.11% | 2.59% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 4.34% | 0.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 3.20% | 0.94% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.16% | 4.75% | 4.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 1.97% | 0.50% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.01% | 2.58% | 1.57% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.36% | 3.00% | 2.64% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 0.15% | 2.72% | 2.57% |
43.6% of KOOL is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or KOOL?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while KOOL charges 0.93%. ADME is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or KOOL?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +16.89% for KOOL, so KOOL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or KOOL?
KOOL has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 10.6% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -15.7% vs KOOL -20.6%.
Should I hold both ADME and KOOL?
ADME and KOOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and KOOL?
43.6% of KOOL's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 43.6% of KOOL's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 44 in KOOL.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or KOOL?
ADME yields 0.36% while KOOL yields 0.43%, so KOOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOOL better than ADME?
ADME has a lower expense ratio. KOOL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.