ADME vs LRGC
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Which is better, ADME or LRGC?
Nearly the same fund. LRGC costs less.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 167 | 72 |
| YTD Return | +9.94% | +10.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.86% | +13.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.1%Best | 12.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -19.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,902 | $17,762Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3%Best | 44.8% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
ADME vs LRGC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
ADME vs LRGC Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while LRGC returned +13.29%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 10.99% for LRGC.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +20.81% for LRGC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 11.1% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ADME and -19.4% for LRGC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while LRGC charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $39 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.53% for LRGC.
Holdings Overlap
55.8% of ADME's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 80.4% of LRGC's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
Most of LRGC is already inside ADME. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
46 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 69 in LRGC, against full books of 167 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for LRGC that do not appear in our book for ADME (15.5% of the fund), and 117 for ADME that do not appear in LRGC (43.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in LRGC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.85% | 8.71% | 0.86% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.44% | 5.71% | 1.73% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.70% | 6.66% | 0.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.56% | 6.09% | 0.53% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 4.69% | 0.95% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.26% | 3.44% | 1.18% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 2.93% | 0.46% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.88% | 3.14% | 1.26% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.52% | 1.61% | 0.09% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.64% | 0.76% | 0.88% |
80.4% of LRGC is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or LRGC?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while LRGC charges 0.39%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or LRGC?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs +13.29% for LRGC, so LRGC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or LRGC?
LRGC has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 11.1% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -15.7% vs LRGC -19.4%.
Should I hold both ADME and LRGC?
ADME and LRGC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and LRGC?
80.4% of LRGC's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 80.4% of LRGC's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 69 in LRGC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or LRGC?
ADME yields 0.36% while LRGC yields 0.53%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LRGC better than ADME?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.