ADME vs MILN
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
Which is better, ADME or MILN?
Each has led over a different period.
MILN has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, MILN over the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | MILN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 0.33% |
| Holdings | 167 | 164 |
| YTD Return | +9.94%Best | -7.25% |
| 1Y Return | +10.86%Best | -10.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.81%Best | +12.75% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.38%Best | -0.22% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.7%Best | -44.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,276Best | $9,890 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.3% | 33.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | May 4, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (10.3 years).
ADME vs MILN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.3 years both funds cover.
ADME vs MILN Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Global X Millennial Consumer ETF (MILN) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% while MILN returned -10.86%. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a loss of 7.25% for MILN.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.81% per year against +12.75% for MILN; over five years the annualized figures are +7.38% and -0.22% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, MILN has the edge at +10.84% annualized vs +8.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MILN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 13.4% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.7% for ADME and -44.4% for MILN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while MILN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $50 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.33% for MILN.
Holdings Overlap
16.3% of ADME's money is in holdings MILN also owns. 33.8% of MILN's money is in holdings ADME also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 80 in MILN, against full books of 167 and 164.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 66 positions for MILN that do not appear in our book for ADME (62.0% of the fund), and 151 for ADME that do not appear in MILN (82.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADME | Weight in MILN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.44% | 3.88% | 3.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 3.25% | 0.49% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.26% | 3.51% | 1.25% |
| DISWalt Disney Co/The | 0.30% | 3.10% | 2.80% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 0.25% | 2.87% | 2.62% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp Sedol 2842255 | 0.17% | 2.95% | 2.78% |
| HDHome Depot, Inc. | 0.48% | 2.52% | 2.04% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings Inc | 0.22% | 2.73% | 2.51% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 0.48% | 2.42% | 1.94% |
| NFLXNetflix Inc | 0.68% | 1.99% | 1.31% |
33.8% of MILN is already inside ADME.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or MILN?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MILN charges 0.50%. MILN is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or MILN?
Over the past year ADME returned +10.86% vs -10.86% for MILN, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ADME annualized +8.38% vs +10.84% for MILN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or MILN?
MILN has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 13.4% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -28.7% vs MILN -44.4%.
Should I hold both ADME and MILN?
ADME and MILN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ADME and MILN?
33.8% of MILN's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 33.8% of MILN's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 80 in MILN.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or MILN?
ADME yields 0.36% while MILN yields 0.33%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MILN better than ADME?
MILN has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, MILN over the full window. MILN is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.