ADME vs NQLT

ADME vs NQLT

Which is better, ADME or NQLT?

NQLT costs less.

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.

Lower Fees: NQLTLess Concentrated: ADME

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMENQLT
Expense Ratio0.79%0.48%Best
AUM$313M$50M
Dividend Yield0.36%0.00%
Holdings16763
YTD Return+9.94%Best+2.29%
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.38%-
Top 10 Weight40.3%Best51.6%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsNeuberger Berman
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2016Jul 10, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ADME vs NQLT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ADME against instead:ADME vs SPYADME vs QQQADME vs VOOADME vs VTINQLT against:NQLT vs VXUS

ADME vs NQLT Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Neuberger Quality Select ETF (NQLT) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a gain of 2.29% for NQLT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while NQLT charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $48 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.00% for NQLT.

Holdings Overlap

ADME already in NQLT46.9%
NQLT already in ADME73.6%

46.9% of ADME's money is in holdings NQLT also owns. 73.6% of NQLT's money is in holdings ADME also owns.

Most of NQLT is already inside ADME. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

36 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 63 in NQLT, against full books of 167 and 63.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 23 positions for NQLT that do not appear in our book for ADME (19.9% of the fund), and 127 for ADME that do not appear in NQLT (51.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in NQLTDifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.44%6.97%0.47%
NVDANvidia Corp7.85%6.09%1.76%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.70%7.64%1.94%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.74%7.67%3.93%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C5.56%5.40%0.16%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.79%4.31%2.52%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity1.48%3.65%2.17%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.40%3.14%1.74%
HDHome Depot Inc/The0.48%2.61%2.13%
MCDMcdonald'S Corp0.66%2.03%1.37%

73.6% of NQLT is already inside ADME.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ADMENQLT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or NQLT?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while NQLT charges 0.48%. NQLT is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and NQLT?

73.6% of NQLT's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 73.6% of NQLT's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 63 in NQLT.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or NQLT?

ADME yields 0.36% while NQLT yields 0.00%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NQLT better than ADME?

NQLT has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.