ADME vs OAIW

ADME vs OAIW

Which is better, ADME or OAIW?

OAIW costs less.

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%.

Lower Fees: OAIWLess Concentrated: ADME

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEOAIW
Expense Ratio0.79%0.59%Best
AUM$313M$6M
Dividend Yield0.36%0.00%
Holdings16725
YTD Return+9.94%Best-10.04%
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.38%-
Top 10 Weight40.3%Best60.5%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2016Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ADME vs OAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ADME against instead:ADME vs SPYADME vs QQQADME vs VOOADME vs VTIOAIW against:OAIW vs VXUS

ADME vs OAIW Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (OAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a loss of 10.04% for OAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while OAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.00% for OAIW.

Holdings Overlap

ADME already in OAIW23.4%
OAIW already in ADME42.4%

23.4% of ADME's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 42.4% of OAIW's money is in holdings ADME also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 26 in OAIW, against full books of 167 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 9 positions for OAIW that do not appear in our book for ADME (27.8% of the fund), and 153 for ADME that do not appear in OAIW (75.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in OAIWDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.70%7.58%1.88%
NVDANvidia Corp7.85%5.11%2.74%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.74%5.62%1.88%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.47%4.38%1.91%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.37%6.09%5.72%
SOSouthern Co.0.81%4.03%3.22%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.32%3.05%1.73%
GLWCorning Inc.0.18%2.56%2.38%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.64%2.02%1.38%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock0.35%1.98%1.63%

42.4% of OAIW is already inside ADME.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ADMEOAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or OAIW?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while OAIW charges 0.59%. OAIW is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and OAIW?

42.4% of OAIW's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 42.4% of OAIW's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 26 in OAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or OAIW?

ADME yields 0.36% while OAIW yields 0.00%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OAIW better than ADME?

OAIW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.