ADME vs XAIW

ADME vs XAIW

Which is better, ADME or XAIW?

XAIW costs less.

XAIW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%.

Lower Fees: XAIWLess Concentrated: ADME

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricADMEXAIW
Expense Ratio0.79%0.59%Best
AUM$313M$1M
Dividend Yield0.36%0.00%
Holdings16725
YTD Return+9.94%Best-3.89%
1Y Return+10.86%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.81%-
5Y Return (annualized)+7.38%-
Top 10 Weight40.3%Best61.4%
Fund FamilyAptus ETFsHarbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJun 8, 2016Aug 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ADME vs XAIW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ADME against instead:ADME vs SPYADME vs QQQADME vs VOOADME vs VTIXAIW against:XAIW vs VXUS

ADME vs XAIW Performance

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and SpaceXAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (XAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, ADME is up 9.94% versus a loss of 3.89% for XAIW.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ADME charges 0.79% per year while XAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 0.00% for XAIW.

Holdings Overlap

ADME already in XAIW19.3%
XAIW already in ADME57.0%

19.3% of ADME's money is in holdings XAIW also owns. 57.0% of XAIW's money is in holdings ADME also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

12 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 26 in XAIW, against full books of 167 and 25.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 8 positions for XAIW that do not appear in our book for ADME (23.4% of the fund), and 151 for ADME that do not appear in XAIW (79.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ADMEWeight in XAIWDifference
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies0.01%19.82%19.81%
NVDANvidia Corp7.85%7.15%0.70%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.70%2.73%2.97%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common0.37%5.23%4.86%
TSLATesla Inc1.55%3.61%2.06%
DELLDell Technologies Inc0.41%4.01%3.60%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.0.28%3.73%3.45%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.0.95%2.25%1.30%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity0.64%2.18%1.54%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.0.49%2.28%1.79%

57.0% of XAIW is already inside ADME.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ADMEXAIW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ADME or XAIW?

ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XAIW charges 0.59%. XAIW is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ADME and XAIW?

57.0% of XAIW's money is in holdings ADME also owns. 57.0% of XAIW's is in holdings ADME also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 26 in XAIW.

Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or XAIW?

ADME yields 0.36% while XAIW yields 0.00%, so ADME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XAIW better than ADME?

XAIW has a lower expense ratio. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.