ADPV vs BSR
Adaptiv Select ETF vs Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF
Which is better, ADPV or BSR?
Each has led over a different period.
ADPV has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 3Y and the full window, BSR over 1Y. ADPV is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADPV | BSR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.09% |
| AUM | $176M | $34M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.78% |
| Holdings | 28 | 60 |
| YTD Return | -0.81% | +4.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.77% | +5.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.15%Best | +8.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 9.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3% | -15.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $18,792Best | $12,834 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5%Best | 73.0% |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | Beacon Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2022 | Apr 17, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.5 years).
ADPV vs BSR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
ADPV vs BSR Performance
Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) is an ETF from Adaptive ETFs and Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is an ETF from Beacon Capital Management. Over the past year ADPV returned -3.77% while BSR returned +5.97%. Year to date, ADPV is down 0.81% versus a gain of 4.18% for BSR.
Over three years, ADPV compounded at +22.15% per year against +8.36% for BSR. Across the full 4-year window we track, ADPV has the edge at +19.75% annualized vs +7.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ADPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 9.4% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for ADPV and -15.7% for BSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADPV charges 1.00% per year while BSR charges 1.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $109 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADPV currently yields 0.69% against 2.78% for BSR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 26 holdings in ADPV and 29 in BSR, totalling 99.9% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 29 in BSR, against full books of 28 and 60.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for BSR that do not appear in our book for ADPV (99.8% of the fund), and 22 for ADPV that do not appear in BSR (84.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADPV and BSR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADPV or BSR?
ADPV has an expense ratio of 1.00% while BSR charges 1.09%. ADPV is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADPV or BSR?
Over the past year ADPV returned -3.77% vs +5.97% for BSR, so BSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ADPV annualized +19.75% vs +7.39% for BSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADPV or BSR?
ADPV has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 9.4% for BSR. Worst drawdown: ADPV -22.3% vs BSR -15.7%.
Should I hold both ADPV and BSR?
ADPV and BSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADPV or BSR?
ADPV yields 0.69% while BSR yields 2.78%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BSR better than ADPV?
ADPV has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 3Y and the full window, BSR over 1Y. ADPV is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.