ADPV vs CCSO
Adaptiv Select ETF vs Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF
Which is better, ADPV or CCSO?
ADPV has been ahead.
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADPV is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADPV | CCSO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $176M | $45M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 0.64% |
| Holdings | 28 | 124 |
| YTD Return | -0.81%Best | -3.16% |
| 1Y Return | -3.77%Best | -5.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.15%Best | +11.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8%Best | 22.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3%Best | -23.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $17,542Best | $13,662 |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5%Best | 49.7% |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | Carbon Collective Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2022 | Sep 19, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
ADPV vs CCSO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
ADPV vs CCSO Performance
Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) is an ETF from Adaptive ETFs and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions US Equity ETF (CCSO) is an ETF from Carbon Collective Funds. Over the past year ADPV returned -3.77% while CCSO returned -5.92%. Year to date, ADPV is down 0.81% versus a loss of 3.16% for CCSO.
Over three years, ADPV compounded at +22.15% per year against +11.97% for CCSO. Across the full 4-year window we track, ADPV has the edge at +15.50% annualized vs +8.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 18.8% for ADPV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for ADPV and -23.7% for CCSO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADPV charges 1.00% per year while CCSO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $35 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADPV currently yields 0.69% against 0.64% for CCSO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 26 holdings in ADPV and 123 in CCSO, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 123 in CCSO, against full books of 28 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for CCSO that do not appear in our book for ADPV (85.4% of the fund), and 22 for ADPV that do not appear in CCSO (84.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADPV and CCSO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADPV or CCSO?
ADPV has an expense ratio of 1.00% while CCSO charges 0.35%. CCSO is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADPV or CCSO?
Over the past year ADPV returned -3.77% vs -5.92% for CCSO, so ADPV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ADPV annualized +15.50% vs +8.33% for CCSO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADPV or CCSO?
CCSO has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 18.8% for ADPV. Worst drawdown: ADPV -22.3% vs CCSO -23.7%.
Should I hold both ADPV and CCSO?
ADPV and CCSO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADPV or CCSO?
ADPV yields 0.69% while CCSO yields 0.64%, so ADPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CCSO better than ADPV?
CCSO has a lower expense ratio. ADPV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADPV is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.