ADPV vs RWLC
Adaptiv Select ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, ADPV or RWLC?
RWLC has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADPV | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $176M | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 28 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -0.81% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.77% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.15% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Adaptive ETFs | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2022 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ADPV vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ADPV vs RWLC Performance
Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) is an ETF from Adaptive ETFs and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, ADPV is down 0.81% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADPV charges 1.00% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $32 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADPV currently yields 0.69% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
3.6% of ADPV's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 0.3% of RWLC's money is in holdings ADPV also owns.
ADPV and RWLC share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 28 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for ADPV (98.5% of the fund), and 21 for ADPV that do not appear in RWLC (81.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADPV | Weight in RWLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNCCentene | 3.64% | 0.31% | 3.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADPV and RWLC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADPV or RWLC?
ADPV has an expense ratio of 1.00% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ADPV and RWLC?
3.6% of ADPV's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 0.3% of RWLC's is in holdings ADPV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in ADPV and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADPV or RWLC?
ADPV yields 0.69% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than ADPV?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RWLC led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.