ADX vs RWLC
Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, ADX or RWLC?
ADX has been ahead.
ADX led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADX | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.32% |
| AUM | $3.2B | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.25% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 108 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +10.32% | +18.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.35% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.88% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.53% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.4% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Adams Funds | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 1, 1929 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ADX vs RWLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ADX vs RWLC Performance
Adams Diversified Equity Fund Inc (ADX) is an ETF from Adams Funds and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF (RWLC) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Year to date, ADX is up 10.32% versus a gain of 18.51% for RWLC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Holdings Overlap
57.7% of ADX's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 48.4% of RWLC's money is in holdings ADX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 73 days apart, ADX as of Jun 30, 2026 and RWLC as of Sep 11, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
33 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ADX and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 108 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 66 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for ADX (50.4% of the fund), and 72 for ADX that do not appear in RWLC (42.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ADX | Weight in RWLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.69% | 9.08% | 2.39% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.63% | 6.55% | 1.08% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.82% | 3.56% | 2.26% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.59% | 2.90% | 1.69% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 2.30% | 1.54% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.75% | 2.97% | 1.22% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 2.62% | 2.08% | 0.54% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.87% | 1.20% | 1.67% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.85% | 1.93% | 0.08% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.55% | 2.59% | 2.04% |
57.7% of ADX is already inside RWLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the holdings overlap between ADX and RWLC?
57.7% of ADX's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 48.4% of RWLC's is in holdings ADX also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 105 positions we hold weights for in ADX and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADX or RWLC?
ADX yields 7.25% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than ADX?
ADX led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.