AELV vs TALV
Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, AELV or TALV?
AELV costs less.
AELV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AELV | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $3M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 150 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +11.24% | +14.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.09% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2024 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AELV vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AELV vs TALV Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (AELV) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, AELV is up 11.24% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AELV charges 0.25% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $49 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AELV currently yields 1.38% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
31.2% of AELV's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 47.1% of TALV's money is in holdings AELV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in AELV and 68 in TALV, against full books of 150 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 75 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
AELV holds 50 positions TALV does not, 67.3% of the fund.
Largest: JNJ 4.56%, BMY 3.21%, ADBE 3.16%, BK 3.05%, PFG 3.02%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AELV | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.05% | 5.22% | 1.83% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.20% | 5.51% | 2.31% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.13% | 5.28% | 2.15% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.63% | 1.88% | 1.75% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.55% | 4.00% | 3.45% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 3.01% | 0.77% | 2.24% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 0.74% | 2.97% | 2.23% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.79% | 2.16% | 1.37% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.54% | 2.35% | 1.81% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.58% | 2.00% | 1.42% |
47.1% of TALV is already inside AELV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AELV or TALV?
AELV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while TALV charges 0.49%. AELV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AELV and TALV?
47.1% of TALV's money is in holdings AELV also owns. 47.1% of TALV's is in holdings AELV also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 75 positions we hold weights for in AELV and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AELV or TALV?
AELV yields 1.38% while TALV yields 0.73%, so AELV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than AELV?
AELV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.