AEMG vs JMID

AEMG vs JMID

Which is better, AEMG or JMID?

JMID costs less.

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.8%.

Lower Fees: JMIDLess Concentrated: JMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAEMGJMID
Expense Ratio0.38%0.30%Best
AUM$2M$23M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.53%
Holdings11594
YTD Return-2.28%+8.16%Best
1Y Return-+5.86%
Top 10 Weight27.8%23.9%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsJanus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionAug 26, 2026Sep 17, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AEMG vs JMID growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AEMG against instead:AEMG vs SPYAEMG vs QQQAEMG vs VOOAEMG vs VTIJMID against:JMID vs VXUS

AEMG vs JMID Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF (AEMG) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Year to date, AEMG is down 2.28% versus a gain of 8.16% for JMID.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AEMG charges 0.38% per year while JMID charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $30 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMG currently yields 0.00% against 0.53% for JMID.

Holdings Overlap

AEMG already in JMID47.5%
JMID already in AEMG52.8%

47.5% of AEMG's money is in holdings JMID also owns. 52.8% of JMID's money is in holdings AEMG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

44 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 93 in JMID, against full books of 115 and 94.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 47 positions for JMID that do not appear in our book for AEMG (44.6% of the fund), and 75 for AEMG that do not appear in JMID (48.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AEMGWeight in JMIDDifference
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.4.67%2.76%1.91%
SNOWSnowflake Inc3.31%2.77%0.54%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common2.85%2.16%0.69%
DXCMDexcom Inc.1.97%2.72%0.75%
DDOGDatadog Inc2.59%1.94%0.65%
AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc2.60%1.92%0.68%
EXPEExpedia Inc2.16%2.32%0.16%
NTAPNetapp Inc1.92%2.17%0.25%
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics Inc1.02%2.47%1.45%
ITGartner Inc.1.12%2.09%0.97%

52.8% of JMID is already inside AEMG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AEMGJMID

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AEMG or JMID?

AEMG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while JMID charges 0.30%. JMID is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AEMG and JMID?

52.8% of JMID's money is in holdings AEMG also owns. 52.8% of JMID's is in holdings AEMG also owns. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 93 in JMID.

Which pays a higher dividend, AEMG or JMID?

AEMG yields 0.00% while JMID yields 0.53%, so JMID currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JMID better than AEMG?

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID is less concentrated, with 23.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.