AESL vs DFSV

AESL vs DFSV

Which is better, AESL or DFSV?

DFSV costs less.

DFSV has a lower expense ratio. DFSV is less concentrated, with 6.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.7%.

Lower Fees: DFSVLess Concentrated: DFSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAESLDFSV
Expense Ratio0.40%0.30%Best
AUM$2M$27.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.45%
Holdings10231
YTD Return-2.65%+14.48%Best
1Y Return-+20.41%
3Y Return (annualized)-+16.41%
Top 10 Weight26.7%6.6%Best
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsDimensional
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueSmall Cap Value
InceptionAug 26, 2026Feb 23, 2022

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AESL vs DFSV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AESL against instead:AESL vs SPYAESL vs QQQAESL vs VOOAESL vs VTIDFSV against:DFSV vs VXUS

AESL vs DFSV Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Value ETF (AESL) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) is an ETF from Dimensional. Year to date, AESL is down 2.65% versus a gain of 14.48% for DFSV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AESL charges 0.40% per year while DFSV charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $30 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESL currently yields 0.00% against 1.45% for DFSV.

Holdings Overlap

AESL already in DFSV53.8%
DFSV already in AESL9.3%

53.8% of AESL's money is in holdings DFSV also owns. 9.3% of DFSV's money is in holdings AESL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

64 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in AESL and 996 in DFSV, against full books of 102 and 31.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 740 positions for DFSV that do not appear in our book for AESL (87.0% of the fund), and 53 for AESL that do not appear in DFSV (41.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AESLWeight in DFSVDifference
UBSIUnited Bankshares Inc/Wv3.47%0.43%3.04%
BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc.2.96%0.33%2.63%
HOMBHome Bancshares Inc/ar2.72%0.22%2.50%
ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock2.20%0.59%1.61%
ESNTEssent Group Ltd.2.30%0.40%1.90%
EBFEnnis Inc2.33%0.04%2.29%
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd Common Stock Temp Line1.72%0.22%1.50%
MATXMatson Inc1.45%0.45%1.00%
UMBFUmb Financial Corp.1.39%0.41%0.98%
PBFPbf Energy Inc1.09%0.56%0.53%

53.8% of AESL is already inside DFSV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AESLDFSV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AESL or DFSV?

AESL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while DFSV charges 0.30%. DFSV is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AESL and DFSV?

53.8% of AESL's money is in holdings DFSV also owns. 9.3% of DFSV's is in holdings AESL also owns. They hold 64 positions in common, counted across the 126 positions we hold weights for in AESL and 996 in DFSV.

Which pays a higher dividend, AESL or DFSV?

AESL yields 0.00% while DFSV yields 1.45%, so DFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is DFSV better than AESL?

DFSV has a lower expense ratio. DFSV is less concentrated, with 6.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.