AFSM vs SCDV
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
Which is better, AFSM or SCDV?
AFSM has been ahead.
SCDV has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 1Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFSM | SCDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.70%Best |
| AUM | $130M | $148M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 657 | 40 |
| YTD Return | +19.57%Best | +6.54% |
| 1Y Return | +23.10%Best | +3.53% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.42% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.06% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.2%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,370Best | $10,403 |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.4%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Bahl & Gaynor |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2019 | Dec 11, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
AFSM vs SCDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
AFSM vs SCDV Performance
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor. Over the past year AFSM returned +23.10% while SCDV returned +3.53%. Year to date, AFSM is up 19.57% versus a gain of 6.54% for SCDV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFSM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.5% for SCDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.2% for AFSM and -22.8% for SCDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFSM charges 0.75% per year while SCDV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $70 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFSM currently yields 0.52% against 0.43% for SCDV.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of AFSM's money is in holdings SCDV also owns. 11.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings AFSM also owns.
SCDV and AFSM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 321 positions we hold weights for in AFSM and 36 in SCDV, against full books of 657 and 40.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for SCDV that do not appear in our book for AFSM (84.7% of the fund), and 297 for AFSM that do not appear in SCDV (91.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AFSM and SCDV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFSM or SCDV?
AFSM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCDV charges 0.70%. SCDV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFSM or SCDV?
Over the past year AFSM returned +23.10% vs +3.53% for SCDV, so AFSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AFSM annualized +12.54% vs +2.22% for SCDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AFSM or SCDV?
AFSM has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.5% for SCDV. Worst drawdown: AFSM -22.2% vs SCDV -22.8%.
Should I hold both AFSM and SCDV?
AFSM and SCDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AFSM and SCDV?
11.5% of SCDV's money is in holdings AFSM also owns. 11.5% of SCDV's is in holdings AFSM also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 321 positions we hold weights for in AFSM and 36 in SCDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFSM or SCDV?
AFSM yields 0.52% while SCDV yields 0.43%, so AFSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCDV better than AFSM?
SCDV has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 1Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.