AGD vs FDIF
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fidelity Disruptors ETF
Which is better, AGD or FDIF?
Each has led over a different period.
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. AGD led over the full window, FDIF over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGD | FDIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $110M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.36% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 89 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +4.34% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.13% | +15.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +21.73%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.73% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.3%Best | -22.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,817Best | $16,590 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.7% | - |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2006 | Feb 13, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
AGD vs FDIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
AGD vs FDIF Performance
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year AGD returned +12.13% while FDIF returned +15.79%. Year to date, AGD is up 4.34% versus a gain of 14.35% for FDIF.
Over three years, AGD compounded at +21.49% per year against +21.73% for FDIF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 16.8% for FDIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for AGD and -22.6% for FDIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGD charges 1.35% per year while FDIF charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $50 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGD currently yields 12.36% against 0.25% for FDIF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 87 holdings in AGD and 6 in FDIF, totalling 97.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, AGD as of Jul 31, 2026 and FDIF as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AGD and 6 in FDIF, against full books of 89 and 10.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for FDIF that do not appear in our book for AGD (100.0% of the fund), and 47 for AGD that do not appear in FDIF (56.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGD and FDIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGD or FDIF?
AGD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while FDIF charges 0.50%. FDIF is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGD or FDIF?
Over the past year AGD returned +12.13% vs +15.79% for FDIF, so FDIF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGD or FDIF?
AGD has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 16.8% for FDIF. Worst drawdown: AGD -20.3% vs FDIF -22.6%.
Should I hold both AGD and FDIF?
AGD and FDIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGD or FDIF?
AGD yields 12.36% while FDIF yields 0.25%, so AGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIF better than AGD?
FDIF has a lower expense ratio. AGD led over the full window, FDIF over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.