AGD vs FDLS
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
Which is better, AGD or FDLS?
Each has led over a different period.
FDLS has a lower expense ratio. AGD led over 3Y, FDLS over 1Y and the full window. FDLS is less concentrated, with 11.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGD | FDLS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.66%Best |
| AUM | $313M | $259M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.36% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 89 | 203 |
| YTD Return | +4.34% | +15.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.13% | +21.43%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49%Best | +19.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.73% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 18.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.3%Best | -23.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $17,230 | $18,093Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.7% | 11.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Inspire ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 26, 2006 | Aug 23, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 24, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).
AGD vs FDLS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
AGD vs FDLS Performance
Abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year AGD returned +12.13% while FDLS returned +21.43%. Year to date, AGD is up 4.34% versus a gain of 15.94% for FDLS.
Over three years, AGD compounded at +21.49% per year against +19.89% for FDLS. Across the full 4-year window we track, FDLS has the edge at +15.56% annualized vs +14.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 18.3% for FDLS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.3% for AGD and -23.3% for FDLS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGD charges 1.35% per year while FDLS charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $66 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGD currently yields 12.36% against 0.86% for FDLS.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of AGD's money is in holdings FDLS also owns. 1.0% of FDLS's money is in holdings AGD also owns.
AGD and FDLS share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, AGD as of Jul 31, 2026 and FDLS as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AGD and 101 in FDLS, against full books of 89 and 203.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 88 positions for FDLS that do not appear in our book for AGD (86.9% of the fund), and 46 for AGD that do not appear in FDLS (53.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AGD | Weight in FDLS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.35% | 1.02% | 2.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGD and FDLS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGD or FDLS?
AGD has an expense ratio of 1.35% while FDLS charges 0.66%. FDLS is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGD or FDLS?
Over the past year AGD returned +12.13% vs +21.43% for FDLS, so FDLS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AGD annualized +14.19% vs +15.56% for FDLS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGD or FDLS?
AGD has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 18.3% for FDLS. Worst drawdown: AGD -20.3% vs FDLS -23.3%.
Should I hold both AGD and FDLS?
AGD and FDLS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AGD and FDLS?
3.4% of AGD's money is in holdings FDLS also owns. 1.0% of FDLS's is in holdings AGD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in AGD and 101 in FDLS.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGD or FDLS?
AGD yields 12.36% while FDLS yields 0.86%, so AGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDLS better than AGD?
FDLS has a lower expense ratio. AGD led over 3Y, FDLS over 1Y and the full window. FDLS is less concentrated, with 11.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.