AGRH vs FLCB
iShares Interest Rate Hedged US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Franklin US Core Bond ETF
Which is better, AGRH or FLCB?
AGRH has been ahead.
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. AGRH led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRH | FLCB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $8M | $3.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 4.50% |
| Holdings | 113 | 642 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.5%Best | 6.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7%Best | -9.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $12,373Best | $11,244 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2022 | Sep 17, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight, Style.
The two price series end 63 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AGRH has data through Aug 12, 2026 and FLCB through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2022 to Aug 12, 2026 (4.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLCB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.3% compared with 1.5% for AGRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for AGRH and -9.4% for FLCB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRH charges 0.13% per year while FLCB charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $15 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRH currently yields 4.11% against 4.50% for FLCB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in AGRH and 342 in FLCB, totalling 97.2% and 61.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 59 days apart, AGRH as of Aug 4, 2026 and FLCB as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in AGRH and 342 in FLCB, against full books of 113 and 642.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGRH and FLCB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRH or FLCB?
AGRH has an expense ratio of 0.13% while FLCB charges 0.15%. AGRH is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AGRH or FLCB?
FLCB has been the more volatile fund at 6.3% annualized versus 1.5% for AGRH. Worst drawdown: AGRH -1.7% vs FLCB -9.4%.
Should I hold both AGRH and FLCB?
AGRH and FLCB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRH or FLCB?
AGRH yields 4.11% while FLCB yields 4.50%, so FLCB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCB better than AGRH?
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. AGRH led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.