AGRH vs RSBT
iShares Interest Rate Hedged US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
Which is better, AGRH or RSBT?
Each has led over a different period.
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. AGRH led over the full window, RSBT over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRH | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $8M | $165M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 2.95% |
| Holdings | 113 | 34 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.4%Best | 11.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.7%Best | -23.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $12,005Best | $9,641 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Return Stacked ETF |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2022 | Feb 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight, Style.
The two price series end 63 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. AGRH has data through Aug 12, 2026 and RSBT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2023 to Aug 12, 2026 (3.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 1.4% for AGRH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.7% for AGRH and -23.6% for RSBT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRH charges 0.13% per year while RSBT charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $101 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRH currently yields 4.11% against 2.95% for RSBT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in AGRH and 2 in RSBT, totalling 97.2% and 90.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 65 days apart, AGRH as of Aug 4, 2026 and RSBT as of Oct 8, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in AGRH and 2 in RSBT, against full books of 113 and 34.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGRH and RSBT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRH or RSBT?
AGRH has an expense ratio of 0.13% while RSBT charges 1.01%. AGRH is the cheaper option, by $88 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, AGRH or RSBT?
RSBT has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 1.4% for AGRH. Worst drawdown: AGRH -1.7% vs RSBT -23.6%.
Should I hold both AGRH and RSBT?
AGRH and RSBT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRH or RSBT?
AGRH yields 4.11% while RSBT yields 2.95%, so AGRH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSBT better than AGRH?
AGRH has a lower expense ratio. AGRH led over the full window, RSBT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.