AGRW vs VYM
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, AGRW or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AGRW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGRW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $118M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 51 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +9.38% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.78% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -11.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,295Best | $12,704 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.5% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
AGRW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
AGRW vs VYM Performance
Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGRW returned +10.78% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, AGRW is up 9.38% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for AGRW and -11.3% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGRW charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGRW currently yields 0.11% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
8.9% of AGRW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.1% of VYM's money is in holdings AGRW also owns.
VYM and AGRW share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AGRW and 602 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AGRW (86.8% of the fund), and 40 for AGRW that do not appear in VYM (88.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGRW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGRW or VYM?
Over the past year AGRW returned +10.78% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AGRW annualized +20.91% vs +17.30% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AGRW -16.5% vs VYM -11.3%.
Should I hold both AGRW and VYM?
AGRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AGRW and VYM?
11.1% of VYM's money is in holdings AGRW also owns. 11.1% of VYM's is in holdings AGRW also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in AGRW and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGRW or VYM?
AGRW yields 0.11% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than AGRW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. AGRW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.