AIEQ vs VTI
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $116M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 326 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +9.72% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.97% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.64% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.86% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,085 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 18, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9 years).
AIEQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs VTI Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 9.72% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, AIEQ compounded at +18.64% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.86% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.40% annualized vs +9.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 16.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for AIEQ and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.9% of AIEQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 55.2% of VTI's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
Most of AIEQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
156 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 326 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 999 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (42.4% of the fund), and 3 for AIEQ that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.13% | 2.38% | 6.75% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.99% | 6.88% | 2.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.24% | 6.30% | 5.06% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.18% | 5.11% | 2.93% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B | 3.66% | 1.23% | 2.43% |
| GOOGAlphabate, Inc Class C | 2.76% | 2.12% | 0.64% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc., Long Equities | 4.25% | 0.46% | 3.79% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.27% | 3.41% | 2.14% |
| MAMastercard Inc Cl. A | 3.63% | 0.63% | 3.00% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. - Class a | 1.49% | 2.70% | 1.21% |
98.9% of AIEQ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or VTI?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or VTI?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +10.97% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), AIEQ annualized +9.53% vs +13.40% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or VTI?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 16.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -39.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and VTI?
AIEQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and VTI?
98.9% of AIEQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 55.2% of VTI's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 156 positions in common, counted across the 163 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or VTI?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AIEQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.