AINT vs FTLS

AINT vs FTLS

Which is better, AINT or FTLS?

AINT costs less.

AINT has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: AINT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAINTFTLS
Expense Ratio1.25%Best1.38%
AUM$14M$2.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.87%
Holdings22363
YTD Return+23.89%Best+9.83%
1Y Return-+13.43%
3Y Return (annualized)-+14.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.59%
Fund FamilyFINQ AI, LLCFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 5, 2026Sep 8, 2014

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

AINT vs FTLS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AINT against instead:AINT vs SPYAINT vs QQQAINT vs VOOAINT vs VTIFTLS against:FTLS vs VXUS

AINT vs FTLS Performance

FINQ DOLLAR NEUTRAL US Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) is an ETF from FINQ AI, LLC and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Year to date, AINT is up 23.89% versus a gain of 9.83% for FTLS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AINT charges 1.25% per year while FTLS charges 1.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $138 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AINT currently yields 0.00% against 0.87% for FTLS.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 23 holdings in AINT and 507 in FTLS, totalling 106.9% and 94.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 9 positions appear in both.

9 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in AINT and 507 in FTLS, against full books of 22 and 363.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AINTWeight in FTLSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.42%6.67%1.75%
METAMeta Platforms Inc8.48%1.16%7.32%
STXSeagate Technolo7.24%2.05%5.19%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.8.20%0.79%7.41%
ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock8.78%-0.20%8.98%
LENLennar Corp. Class A-9.55%-0.13%9.42%
EXPDExpeditors International Of Washington Inc-10.44%0.12%10.56%
GPCGenuine Parts Co-10.22%-0.11%10.11%
HPQHP Inc-10.61%0.23%10.84%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AINT and FTLS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AINTFTLS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AINT or FTLS?

AINT has an expense ratio of 1.25% while FTLS charges 1.38%. AINT is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, AINT or FTLS?

AINT yields 0.00% while FTLS yields 0.87%, so FTLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FTLS better than AINT?

AINT has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.