AINT vs METU

AINT vs METU

Which is better, AINT or METU?

METU costs less.

METU has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: METU

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAINTMETU
Expense Ratio1.25%1.02%Best
AUM$14M$506M
Dividend Yield0.00%2.70%
Holdings2220
YTD Return+23.89%Best+2.89%
1Y Return--17.61%
Fund FamilyFINQ AI, LLCDirexion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 5, 2026Jun 5, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

AINT vs METU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AINT against instead:AINT vs SPYAINT vs QQQAINT vs VOOAINT vs VTIMETU against:METU vs VXUS

AINT vs METU Performance

FINQ DOLLAR NEUTRAL US Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) is an ETF from FINQ AI, LLC and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Year to date, AINT is up 23.89% versus a gain of 2.89% for METU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AINT charges 1.25% per year while METU charges 1.02%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $102 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AINT currently yields 0.00% against 2.70% for METU.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 23 holdings in AINT and 4 in METU, totalling 106.9% and 87.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.

1 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in AINT and 4 in METU, against full books of 22 and 20.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AINTWeight in METUDifference
METAMeta Platforms Inc8.48%17.27%8.79%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AINT and METU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AINTMETU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AINT or METU?

AINT has an expense ratio of 1.25% while METU charges 1.02%. METU is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, AINT or METU?

AINT yields 0.00% while METU yields 2.70%, so METU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is METU better than AINT?

METU has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.