AIOO vs QBSF
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF
Which is better, AIOO or QBSF?
QBSF has been ahead.
QBSF led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIOO | QBSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64%Tie | 0.64%Tie |
| AUM | $63M | $64M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +3.07% | +4.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.80% | +7.59%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.7%Best | 2.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.7%Best | -1.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,593 | $11,012Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | AllianzIM |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
AIOO vs QBSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
AIOO vs QBSF Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) is an ETF from AllianzIM and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year AIOO returned +3.80% while QBSF returned +7.59%. Year to date, AIOO is up 3.07% versus a gain of 4.99% for QBSF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QBSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 2.2% compared with 1.7% for AIOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.7% for AIOO and -1.6% for QBSF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIOO charges 0.64% per year while QBSF charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $64 annually. On income, AIOO currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for QBSF.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AIOO and QBSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIOO or QBSF?
AIOO has an expense ratio of 0.64% while QBSF charges 0.64%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, AIOO or QBSF?
Over the past year AIOO returned +3.80% vs +7.59% for QBSF, so QBSF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AIOO annualized +4.53% vs +7.70% for QBSF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIOO or QBSF?
QBSF has been the more volatile fund at 2.2% annualized versus 1.7% for AIOO. Worst drawdown: AIOO -0.7% vs QBSF -1.6%.
Should I hold both AIOO and QBSF?
AIOO and QBSF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIOO or QBSF?
AIOO yields 0.00% while QBSF yields 0.00%, so QBSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QBSF better than AIOO?
QBSF led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.