AJUL vs ZALT

AJUL vs ZALT

Which is better, AJUL or ZALT?

ZALT has been ahead.

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ZALTHigher Returns: ZALT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAJULZALT
Expense Ratio0.79%0.69%Best
AUM$98M$794M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings2118
YTD Return+4.38%+6.44%Best
1Y Return+6.14%+9.12%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+10.33%
Volatility (annualized)3.4%Best3.5%
Max Drawdown-6.1%Best-8.2%
$10,000 over 2.3 years$11,752$12,254Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJul 1, 2024Oct 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

AJUL vs ZALT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare AJUL against instead:AJUL vs SPYAJUL vs QQQAJUL vs VOOAJUL vs VTIZALT against:ZALT vs VXUS

AJUL vs ZALT Performance

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to July 2026 (AJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year AJUL returned +6.14% while ZALT returned +9.12%. Year to date, AJUL is up 4.38% versus a gain of 6.44% for ZALT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ZALT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.5% compared with 3.4% for AJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.1% for AJUL and -8.2% for ZALT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AJUL charges 0.79% per year while ZALT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $69 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZALT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AJUL and ZALT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AJULZALT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AJUL or ZALT?

AJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZALT charges 0.69%. ZALT is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, AJUL or ZALT?

Over the past year AJUL returned +6.14% vs +9.12% for ZALT, so ZALT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AJUL annualized +7.27% vs +9.24% for ZALT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AJUL or ZALT?

ZALT has been the more volatile fund at 3.5% annualized versus 3.4% for AJUL. Worst drawdown: AJUL -6.1% vs ZALT -8.2%.

Should I hold both AJUL and ZALT?

AJUL and ZALT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AJUL or ZALT?

AJUL yields 0.00% while ZALT yields 0.00%, so ZALT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZALT better than AJUL?

ZALT has a lower expense ratio. ZALT led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.