ALAI vs RVRB
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF vs Reverb ETF
Which is better, ALAI or RVRB?
ALAI has been ahead.
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. ALAI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALAI | RVRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.30%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.16% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 72 | 499 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.4% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $16,602Best | $12,692 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Reverb ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 4, 2024 | Nov 3, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 202 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ALAI has data through Oct 14, 2026 and RVRB through Mar 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 5, 2024 to Mar 26, 2026 (2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ALAI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 11.3% for RVRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.4% for ALAI and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALAI charges 0.58% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $30 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALAI currently yields 1.16% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.6% of RVRB's money is in holdings ALAI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ALAI, our book for it covers 2.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 254 days apart, ALAI as of Sep 11, 2026 and RVRB as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in ALAI and 493 in RVRB, against full books of 72 and 499.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ALAI | Weight in RVRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.21% | 0.61% | 1.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ALAI and RVRB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALAI or RVRB?
ALAI has an expense ratio of 0.58% while RVRB charges 0.30%. RVRB is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, ALAI or RVRB?
ALAI has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 11.3% for RVRB. Worst drawdown: ALAI -29.4% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both ALAI and RVRB?
ALAI and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALAI or RVRB?
ALAI yields 1.16% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so ALAI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RVRB better than ALAI?
RVRB has a lower expense ratio. ALAI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.